Supermax Prisons in U.S. Already Hold Terrorists. So What's the Problem?.

[Sir F. A. Rien]

In article

The drug cartel have been know to run their dealings from within
prisons, so why do you think the terrorists couldn't do the same?
Your not very bright Harry/

Just put the terrorists in solitary confinement!
I propose that Alcatraz be used to imprison terrorists.

Why is that better than GITMO?

Because Timothea's stupid!

She thinks rehabbing the rock will bring funds to CAFA land!

Not bout any concern for the situation, just more CAFA greed!

[Sir F. A. Rien]

In article

The drug cartel have been know to run their dealings from within
prisons, so why do you think the terrorists couldn't do the same?
Your not very bright Harry/

Just put the terrorists in solitary confinement!
I propose that Alcatraz be used to imprison terrorists.

All you need do is rename GITMO to Alcatraz-2
Liberals rename everything to make it all better.
The war on terrorism is now called "man made disaster" and we are all happy.

And Global Warming is now "Major Climatic Change" as Goré's 'Inconvenient
Truth' turns out to be a "Convenient Lie" for political purposes.

Hint, read a scientific CLIMATOLOGY report, not a political fundraiser!

[Sir F. A. Rien]

In article

The drug cartel have been know to run their dealings from within
prisons, so why do you think the terrorists couldn't do the same?
Your not very bright Harry/

Just put the terrorists in solitary confinement!
I propose that Alcatraz be used to imprison terrorists.

Why is that better than GITMO?

Alcatraz is on U.S. territory, on an island in the SF Bay.

GITMO is leased from Cuba and has a Naval Base that is also like a US
ship.... and is like Alcatraz, owned by the USA. We make the rules.
Personally I like the idea of moving them to San Fransisco, but if you
want to do what is the most efficient and simple, leave them at GITMO
until we are forced by some physical reason to move them.

I don't, gives the terrorists a 'reason' to attack SF !
[not that they really want a valid one - they'll justify it somehow!]

[Sir F. A. Rien]

GITMO is leased from Cuba and has a Naval Base that is also like a US
ship.... and is like Alcatraz, owned by the USA. We make the rules.

I thought the whole point was that US law doesn't apply there.

Personally I like the idea of moving them to San Fransisco, but if you
want to do what is the most efficient and simple, leave them at GITMO
until we are forced by some physical reason to move them.

As a prison, Alcatraz is in ruins. It would require tearing it down to
foundations and building from scratch. That's rather expensive just for a lame
gloat.

Ahhh, but look at the jobs for CAFAs - mostly illegal mexicans, but ...!

[Sir F. A. Rien]

GITMO is leased from Cuba and has a Naval Base that is also like a US
ship.... and is like Alcatraz, owned by the USA. We make the rules.

I thought the whole point was that US law doesn't apply there.

It doesn't and that *has* been the whole point.
Same w/Bagram and Abu Ghraib.
We can be as immoral and evil as we want as long as we're outside the
jurisdiction of US law. Or maybe not even that limited if we're hooked up
in the Executive branch.

... or Congress, or are a 'civil servant' or are in state politics, or are
...